I believe that the life and property of the individual are inviolable. A benevolent society cannot be built on harming people or seizing what they have honestly earned without just cause.

Confidence

High

Current support

• Without security in person and property, cooperation gives way to fear and predation.
• Every durable social contract assumes that innocent people are not legitimate targets of violence or theft.
• Sample: Fraser Institute Area 2 scores show countries with stronger legal systems and property rights consistently rank higher on economic freedom and income.

What could disprove it

Show that a stable, benevolent society can be sustained while routinely violating innocent life or property.

View belief and submit a challenge · 3 resources →

I believe that consent is the moral basis of legitimate interaction. Unity built on force is domination, not cooperation.

Confidence

High

Current support

• Voluntary agreements align incentives and reduce resentment.
• Coerced participation corrupts both the coerced and the coercer.
• Sample: Nobel laureate Elinor Ostrom documented hundreds of cases where communities self-govern resources through agreed rules rather than top-down force.

What could disprove it

Show that widespread coercion produces more trust, prosperity, and moral integrity than widespread consent.

View belief and submit a challenge · 3 resources →

I believe that truth matters more than comfort. A benevolent society must prefer painful honesty over soothing falsehood.

Confidence

High

Current support

• Policies built on pleasant lies eventually harm the people they claim to help.
• Trust collapses when leaders and institutions prioritize image over reality.
• Sample: Edelman Trust Barometer repeatedly finds that dishonesty and lack of transparency are top drivers of institutional distrust worldwide.

What could disprove it

Show that societies which suppress uncomfortable truths reliably become more benevolent and unified over time.

View belief and submit a challenge · 3 resources →

I believe that law should apply equally to rulers and ruled. Without equal justice, unity becomes obedience to privilege.

Confidence

High

Current support

• Selective enforcement breeds cynicism and rebellion.
• Equal treatment under law is the minimum condition for public trust.
• Sample: World Justice Project Rule of Law Index ranks 142+ countries — unequal application of law correlates with lower order and security scores.

What could disprove it

Show that societies with privileged legal classes remain more peaceful and just than those with equal application of law.

View belief and submit a challenge · 3 resources →

I believe that power should be limited, divided, and accountable. Concentrated power attracts corruption; benevolence requires checks.

Confidence

High

Current support

• History shows unchecked power tends toward abuse, even when begun with good intentions.
• Separation of powers reduces the cost of any single actor's failure or malice.
• Sample: North vs South Korea — same culture and geography, divergent institutions after 1953; GDP per capita gap exceeds 20:1 (World Bank data).

What could disprove it

Show that highly concentrated, minimally accountable power consistently produces better outcomes for ordinary people than limited power.

View belief and submit a challenge · 3 resources →

I believe that peaceful resolution should be preferred over violence. Force may sometimes be necessary in defense, but it is never a substitute for reason.

Confidence

High

Current support

• Violence escalates cycles of retaliation and trauma.
• Durable agreements require parties to remain alive and willing to coexist.
• Sample: Uppsala Conflict Data Program records thousands of battle deaths annually — societies that institutionalize negotiation reduce recurring violence.

What could disprove it

Show that societies which routinely choose violence over deliberation become more unified and benevolent.

View belief and submit a challenge · 3 resources →

I believe that voluntary exchange creates mutual benefit. Trade is cooperation, not exploitation, when both parties consent and information is honest.

Confidence

High

Current support

• People trade when they expect to be better off, not worse off.
• Prosperity grows when individuals can specialize and exchange freely.
• Sample: WTO reports that trade-open economies grew faster on average over recent decades than highly closed economies.

What could disprove it

Show that banning or heavily restricting voluntary exchange improves welfare more than allowing it under honest rules.

View belief and submit a challenge · 3 resources →

I believe that charity is virtuous, but coercion in the name of charity is not. Benevolence must be chosen, or it ceases to be moral.

Confidence

High

Current support

• Moral credit requires a free choice to help.
• Forced 'generosity' often breeds resentment and dependency without dignity.
• Sample: U.S. charitable giving exceeded $500 billion annually in recent years (Giving USA) — chosen aid distinct from tax-funded transfer.

What could disprove it

Show that coerced redistribution produces stronger character, gratitude, and social trust than voluntary charity.

View belief and submit a challenge · 3 resources →

I believe that the right to speak, question, and dissent is essential to social health. A society that punishes honest challenge cannot stay truthful or unified for long.

Confidence

High

Current support

• Error is corrected only when it can be named aloud.
• Suppressed speech does not disappear; it festers and returns as extremism.
• Sample: Freedom House Freedom in the World index ties expression rights to broader political rights scores across 210 countries.

What could disprove it

Show that suppressing dissent produces more accurate institutions and stronger long-term unity than protecting it.

View belief and submit a challenge · 3 resources →

I believe that human beings have inherent worth beyond utility. A benevolent society treats people as sacred, not disposable.

Confidence

High

Current support

• Reducing persons to their economic or political usefulness justifies cruelty.
• Dignity is the foundation of both rights and compassion.
• Sample: UDHR Article 1 — dignity and equal rights are declared inherent, not granted by utility to the state.

What could disprove it

Show that treating human worth as purely instrumental produces a more benevolent and stable society.

View belief and submit a challenge · 3 resources →

I believe that no person should be treated as a means to another's end. Benevolence requires seeing each person as an end in themselves.

Confidence

High

Current support

• Using people as tools dehumanizes both victim and user.
• Kant's categorical imperative remains a practical guardrail against political cruelty.
• Sample: Kant's Formula of Humanity (1785) remains a standard reference in medical ethics and human-subjects research rules.

What could disprove it

Show that routinely instrumentalizing people for collective goals produces better moral outcomes than respecting individual ends.

View belief and submit a challenge · 2 resources →

I believe that equal dignity does not require equal outcomes. A benevolent society protects equal standing under the rules, not sameness of result.

Confidence

High

Current support

• People differ in talent, effort, luck, and choice; equal outcomes require unequal treatment.
• Justice concerns fair process; envy concerns comparison.
• Sample: OECD income inequality data shows equal formal rights coexist with wide outcome gaps — enforcing equal outcomes requires unequal treatment.

What could disprove it

Show that enforced equal outcomes increase freedom, trust, and prosperity more than equal rules applied to all.

View belief and submit a challenge · 3 resources →

I believe that context matters as much as facts. Raw facts can mislead when stripped from timing, incentives, or surrounding conditions.

Confidence

High

Current support

• The same statistic can support opposite conclusions when context is hidden.
• Most bad-faith arguments rely on selective framing instead of full reality.
• Sample: Kahneman & Tversky framing experiments show identical expected-value choices flip when the same facts are presented as gains vs losses.

What could disprove it

Show that context regularly makes reasoning less accurate instead of more accurate in high-stakes decisions.

View belief and submit a challenge · 2 resources →

I believe that when better evidence appears, revising a belief is a sign of intellectual integrity, not weakness.

Confidence

High

Current support

• Stubborn consistency often protects identity rather than truth.
• Public reasoning improves when updates are rewarded instead of mocked.
• Sample: Open Science Collaboration (2015) replicated 100 psychology studies — only 36% showed statistically significant results matching originals.

What could disprove it

Show that belief revision predictably harms trust even when the new position is better supported.

View belief and submit a challenge · 2 resources →

I believe that principles should be applied consistently, not selectively. Hypocrisy destroys unity because it signals that power, not morality, sets the rules.

Confidence

High

Current support

• Selective principle application is recognized as injustice even by children.
• Double standards dissolve the legitimacy of leaders and institutions.
• Sample: Transparency International CPI — countries with selective enforcement score worse on corruption and public trust.

What could disprove it

Show that societies thrive more when elites routinely exempt themselves from the rules they impose on others.

View belief and submit a challenge · 2 resources →

I believe that moral claims should be tested by their real-world consequences. A belief that sounds noble but reliably produces harm should be revised.

Confidence

High

Current support

• Good intentions are not sufficient when outcomes repeatedly harm the vulnerable.
• Evidence over time reveals whether a moral rule actually serves human flourishing.
• Sample: Bastiat's broken-window fallacy (1850) — visible 'benefits' of destruction hide unseen losses, a template for testing moral policies by outcomes.

What could disprove it

Show that moral systems which ignore observed outcomes produce more benevolent societies than those that learn from results.

View belief and submit a challenge · 3 resources →

I believe that communities thrive when people take responsibility, not only demand rights. Rights without responsibility produce resentment and fracture.

Confidence

High

Current support

• Sustainable freedom requires citizens who restrain themselves and contribute.
• Cultures that emphasize only entitlement tend toward conflict and dependency.
• Sample: Tocqueville (1835) observed American voluntary associations as the school of self-governance alongside formal rights.

What could disprove it

Show that societies emphasizing rights without personal responsibility become more unified and benevolent.

View belief and submit a challenge · 2 resources →

I believe that families and local communities are the first layer of social care. Strong small bonds make large-scale unity possible without tyranny.

Confidence

High

Current support

• Most care is delivered locally, not by distant bureaucracies.
• Healthy families and neighborhoods reduce demand for coercive state intervention.
• Sample: Putnam's Bowling Alone documents declining U.S. civic association membership from peak mid-20th century — correlates with trust erosion.

What could disprove it

Show that weakening family and local community produces stronger benevolence and social trust than strengthening them.

View belief and submit a challenge · 2 resources →

I believe that institutions should earn trust through transparency, not demand it through authority. Unity cannot be commanded; it must be justified.

Confidence

High

Current support

• Opaque institutions breed conspiracy and cynicism.
• Transparency allows errors to be corrected before they become catastrophes.
• Sample: Pew Research — U.S. public trust in government fell from ~75% (1958) to ~20% (recent years), tracking perceived honesty and performance.

What could disprove it

Show that secretive, unaccountable institutions maintain higher public trust than transparent ones.

View belief and submit a challenge · 3 resources →

I believe that property rights enable long-term planning and investment. People care for what they own and build; societies that undermine ownership undermine prosperity.

Confidence

High

Current support

• Uncertain property rights discourage saving, building, and maintenance.
• Economic development correlates strongly with secure ownership.
• Sample: de Soto estimated trillions in 'dead capital' locked in extralegal property among the poor without formal titles (IMF Finance & Development, 2001).

What could disprove it

Show that weakening property rights increases investment, care for resources, and long-term prosperity.

View belief and submit a challenge · 3 resources →

I believe that poverty is reduced more reliably by opportunity than by resentment. Benevolence should aim at lifting people up, not only redistributing down.

Confidence

Medium

Current support

• Markets and mobility have lifted billions out of extreme poverty in recent decades.
• Resentment politics often distracts from reforms that expand earning and learning.
• Sample: World Bank — extreme poverty (~$3/day, 2021 PPP) fell from ~44% of world population (1990) to ~10.5% (2022); ~1.5 billion people lifted out.

What could disprove it

Show that societies focused primarily on resentment and restriction outperform those focused on opportunity and exchange for reducing poverty.

View belief and submit a challenge · 3 resources →

I believe that incentives shape behavior, and good systems align incentives with virtue. A society that rewards cheating will not remain benevolent.

Confidence

High

Current support

• People respond to what is rewarded and punished, not only to speeches.
• Perverse incentives corrupt medicine, education, politics, and business alike.
• Sample: Soviet nail factory anecdote (targets by weight vs count) — classic illustration of Goodhart's Law and perverse incentives.

What could disprove it

Show that incentive structures consistently matter less than rhetoric in determining social outcomes.

View belief and submit a challenge · 3 resources →

I believe that honest money and honest contracts are social glue. Deception in economic life destroys trust across the whole society.

Confidence

High

Current support

• Counterfeiting, fraud, and broken contracts erode cooperation.
• Stable exchange requires predictable rules and truthful dealing.
• Sample: Reinhart & Rogoff catalog 800+ years of sovereign defaults — debasement and broken promises recur when contracts are not honored.

What could disprove it

Show that widespread economic deception strengthens social trust and benevolence.

View belief and submit a challenge · 3 resources →

I believe that forgiveness and restoration should be possible where truth and repentance exist. Unity requires a path back from failure, not permanent exile for every mistake.

Confidence

High

Current support

• Societies without mercy become brittle and vengeful.
• Restoration preserves families, workplaces, and communities when harm has been acknowledged.
• Sample: NIJ reports restorative justice programs can reduce recidivism and increase victim satisfaction vs punishment-only models in several studies.

What could disprove it

Show that permanent punishment without restoration produces more benevolent communities than truth-based forgiveness.

View belief and submit a challenge · 2 resources →

I believe that gratitude and humility restrain arrogance. Societies that forget gratitude become cruel, even when they call themselves moral.

Confidence

High

Current support

• Gratitude counters entitlement and tribal hatred.
• Humble leaders and citizens are less likely to dehumanize opponents.
• Sample: Emmons (UC Davis) gratitude interventions show measurable increases in wellbeing and prosocial behavior in randomized trials.

What could disprove it

Show that cultures of ingratitude and pride produce more benevolent treatment of the weak than cultures of gratitude and humility.

View belief and submit a challenge · 2 resources →

I believe that purpose beyond self-interest gives unity a reason to endure. Shared meaning helps people sacrifice short-term gain for long-term good.

Confidence

Medium

Current support

• Pure self-interest alone struggles to sustain sacrifice for strangers or future generations.
• Communities with shared purpose weather crises better than those without.
• Sample: World Happiness Report 2024 — sense of purpose and social support rank among top predictors of national wellbeing scores.

What could disprove it

Show that societies with no transcendent purpose outperform purposeful societies in cooperation and benevolence.

View belief and submit a challenge · 2 resources →

I believe that claims about reality should be tested against observable evidence. Benevolence without truth becomes well-intentioned harm.

Confidence

High

Current support

• Reality does not bend to wishful thinking; policies must answer to results.
• Observable outcomes are the final court for factual claims.
• Sample: NIH reports over 300,000 registered clinical trials — modern medicine built on observable, replicable evidence standards.

What could disprove it

Show a class of important beliefs where objective evidence and observed outcomes should not carry decisive weight.

View belief and submit a challenge · 3 resources →

I believe that expertise is valuable, but expertise is not infallible authority. Science serves society best when it can be questioned openly.

Confidence

High

Current support

• Expert consensus has been wrong before and will be again.
• Progress requires challenge, replication, and revision.
• Sample: Ioannidis (2005) estimated most published medical research findings may be false positives given bias and sample sizes.

What could disprove it

Show that treating expert authority as beyond question produces better long-term outcomes than open scrutiny.

View belief and submit a challenge · 2 resources →

I believe that education should teach people how to think, not only what to think. A unified benevolent society needs citizens who can reason, not just obey narratives.

Confidence

High

Current support

• Indoctrination produces conformity, not wisdom.
• Critical thinking is essential for evaluating leaders, media, and policy.
• Sample: SHEG Stanford studies found most students could not distinguish ads from news online without explicit critical-thinking training.

What could disprove it

Show that education focused on rote acceptance of approved views produces more benevolent citizens than education focused on reasoning.

View belief and submit a challenge · 2 resources →

I believe that history should be studied honestly, including our own failures. Societies that mythologize themselves repeat their worst mistakes.

Confidence

High

Current support

• Sanitized history prevents learning from past atrocities and errors.
• Honest memory is a safeguard against repeating cruelty in new forms.
• Sample: Post-war Germany's honest confrontation with Nazism contrasts with societies that suppressed history — different trust and stability trajectories.

What could disprove it

Show that nations which suppress uncomfortable history become more just and unified than those that confront it.

View belief and submit a challenge · 2 resources →

I believe the purpose of human life is to prosper and live happily — and that a good society protects the conditions under which each individual can pursue that purpose without initiatory force or coercion.

Confidence

High

Current support

• People consistently act to improve their own welfare when free to choose.
• Societies that protect individual choice and property tend to produce greater prosperity than those built on extraction and control.
• Sample: UN SDG 1 tracking — global extreme poverty rate cut by roughly three-quarters since 1990 despite population growth.

What could disprove it

Show that human flourishing is better served when individuals are routinely prevented from pursuing their own prosperity and happiness by initiatory force.

View belief and submit a challenge · 2 resources →

I believe I hold supreme the value of my own life and happiness, and that no cause is higher than the life and happiness of the individual. When individual life and property rights are protected, the rights of all people are protected.

Confidence

High

Current support

• Moral claims that sacrifice identifiable individuals for abstract collective ends have produced mass harm throughout history.
• Rights language only coheres when it begins with the inviolable individual, not the group average.
• Sample: UDHR Articles 3 and 6 — right to life and recognition before the law as individual baselines, not collective averages.

What could disprove it

Show that societies which subordinate individual life and happiness to collective aims reliably produce more prosperity, trust, and moral integrity than those which protect the individual first.

View belief and submit a challenge · 2 resources →

I believe no individual, group, or government may initiate force, threat of force, or fraud against any person or their property — and that force is justified only in defense against those who violate that rule, with no exceptions.

Confidence

High

Current support

• Initiatory force externalizes cost onto unwilling victims and destroys the basis for voluntary cooperation.
• Defensive force answers aggression without licensing perpetual preemption.
• Sample: Fraser EFW index — countries ranking highest on security of persons and property (Area 2) tend to rank highest overall on economic freedom.

What could disprove it

Show that routine initiatory force by governments or majorities produces more freedom, prosperity, and honest dealing than a strict non-aggression principle with defense only.

View belief and submit a challenge · 2 resources →

I believe I am a laissez-faire capitalist by producing values for others — that real prosperity comes from creating more than I consume, through voluntary exchange, not through political extraction.

Confidence

High

Current support

• Voluntary production and trade have lifted living standards wherever property and contract are respected.
• Value creation aligns self-interest with the welfare of others when exchange is honest and uncoerced.
• Sample: Hall & Lawson survey of 721 papers using EFW index — majority find economic freedom correlates with growth, income, and wellbeing.

What could disprove it

Show that societies which penalize production and reward political redistribution outperform market-based value creation on prosperity and individual dignity.

View belief and submit a challenge · 2 resources →

I believe the mind does not create objective reality but is an objective-reality-identifying organ — and that integrated thinking requires aligning action with what is real, not with wish or mysticism.

Confidence

High

Current support

• Actions based on fantasy or evasion fail when reality contradicts them.
• Integrated thinking — connecting observations, principles, and consequences — improves decisions over isolated slogans.
• Sample: Scientific realism — predictive success of physics and engineering depends on models tracking mind-independent regularities, not wish alone.

What could disprove it

Show that treating the mind as creator rather than discoverer of reality produces better long-term outcomes in science, commerce, and personal life.

View belief and submit a challenge · 2 resources →

I believe the best way to help someone is usually to teach them to help themselves — not to foster permanent dependency that erodes dignity and competence.

Confidence

High

Current support

• Skills and habits of self-support outlast one-time aid.
• Dependency without path to competence breeds resentment on both sides.
• Sample: FAO farmer field schools reached millions of farmers — skill transfer model vs repeated emergency food aid.

What could disprove it

Show that long-term one-way assistance without teaching self-reliance produces more competent, grateful, and prosperous people than empowerment toward independence.

View belief and submit a challenge · 2 resources →

I believe the legal system should replace the truth oath with a contextual honesty oath — because raw factual statements stripped of context can mislead as effectively as lies.

Confidence

High

Current support

• Selective truth-telling is a common tool of deception in law, politics, and commerce.
• Contextual honesty requires full relevant disclosure, not technically true fragments.
• Sample: U.S. perjury law (18 U.S.C. § 1621) punishes false material statements — debate is whether omission of context should carry equal weight.

What could disprove it

Show that the traditional truth oath produces more accurate justice and less manipulation in court than an oath requiring contextual honesty.

View belief and submit a challenge · 2 resources →

I believe all things good for the human organism and its biological needs are morally correct, all things bad for the organism are morally incorrect, and anything else is not a moral issue.

Confidence

Medium

Current support

• Moral confusion often comes from treating taste, tradition, or taboo as moral law.
• Grounding morality in life and harm clarifies what is actually at stake in ethical disputes.
• Sample: Haidt's Moral Foundations Theory — harm/care dimension recognized across cultures as core moral concern tied to organismic welfare.

What could disprove it

Show a coherent moral framework that ignores organismic benefit and harm yet produces clearer, more benevolent guidance for how people should treat one another.

View belief and submit a challenge · 2 resources →

I believe rational, free choice is the prerequisite for integrating reality with human nature — which is the prerequisite for prosperity and happiness, and in turn for romantic love.

Confidence

Medium

Current support

• Coerced 'choices' do not integrate values with reality because the chooser is not free to reject error.
• Deep relationships require persons who can think, choose, and take responsibility for their lives.
• Sample: World Happiness Report — 'freedom to make life choices' is a top weighted factor in national happiness rankings.

What could disprove it

Show that removing rational free choice from major life domains improves individual prosperity, happiness, and capacity for genuine romantic partnership.

View belief and submit a challenge · 2 resources →

I believe I am responsible for my prosperity, happiness, success, and romantic love — not as a denial of hardship, but as the stance required to use my mind, act on reality, and refuse victimhood as an identity.

Confidence

High

Current support

• Agency is the precondition for improvement; abdication of responsibility forecloses learning.
• External barriers exist, but permanent surrender of responsibility guarantees permanent stagnation.
• Sample: Seligman's learned helplessness experiments — perceived lack of control predicts depression-like behavior; agency training reverses it in animal models.

What could disprove it

Show that individuals who treat themselves as powerless victims of circumstance reliably achieve more prosperity and happiness than those who take responsibility within their sphere of action.

View belief and submit a challenge · 2 resources →

I believe law exists to stop injustice — not to create justice by force. When law tries to manufacture outcomes, it often produces new injustice in the name of good intentions.

Confidence

High

Current support

• Justice as an outcome emerges from voluntary exchange, restitution, and consistent rules — not from decree alone.
• Legislated 'social justice' schemes frequently violate innocents while failing to deliver promised equity.
• Sample: Bastiat's The Law (1850) — when law exceeds defense of rights and becomes plunder, it creates the injustice it claims to cure.

What could disprove it

Show that laws designed to create positive justice by force consistently outperform limited laws that only prohibit injustice.

View belief and submit a challenge · 2 resources →

I believe I should produce more values than I consume — that net production is both a moral commitment and the practical basis of prosperity for myself and others.

Confidence

High

Current support

• Chronic consumption without production depletes what others have built.
• Wealth and welfare grow when individuals specialize, produce, and trade surplus.
• Sample: World Bank national accounts — sustained GDP growth requires gross capital formation (investment) exceeding depreciation and pure consumption.

What could disprove it

Show that societies thrive more when most members consume persistently more than they produce than when net production is the norm.

View belief and submit a challenge · 2 resources →