I believe that truth matters more than comfort. A benevolent society must prefer painful honesty over soothing falsehood.

Confidence

High

Current support

• Policies built on pleasant lies eventually harm the people they claim to help.
• Trust collapses when leaders and institutions prioritize image over reality.
• Sample: Edelman Trust Barometer repeatedly finds that dishonesty and lack of transparency are top drivers of institutional distrust worldwide.

What could disprove it

Show that societies which suppress uncomfortable truths reliably become more benevolent and unified over time.

View belief and submit a challenge · 3 resources →

I believe that context matters as much as facts. Raw facts can mislead when stripped from timing, incentives, or surrounding conditions.

Confidence

High

Current support

• The same statistic can support opposite conclusions when context is hidden.
• Most bad-faith arguments rely on selective framing instead of full reality.
• Sample: Kahneman & Tversky framing experiments show identical expected-value choices flip when the same facts are presented as gains vs losses.

What could disprove it

Show that context regularly makes reasoning less accurate instead of more accurate in high-stakes decisions.

View belief and submit a challenge · 2 resources →

I believe that when better evidence appears, revising a belief is a sign of intellectual integrity, not weakness.

Confidence

High

Current support

• Stubborn consistency often protects identity rather than truth.
• Public reasoning improves when updates are rewarded instead of mocked.
• Sample: Open Science Collaboration (2015) replicated 100 psychology studies — only 36% showed statistically significant results matching originals.

What could disprove it

Show that belief revision predictably harms trust even when the new position is better supported.

View belief and submit a challenge · 2 resources →

I believe that principles should be applied consistently, not selectively. Hypocrisy destroys unity because it signals that power, not morality, sets the rules.

Confidence

High

Current support

• Selective principle application is recognized as injustice even by children.
• Double standards dissolve the legitimacy of leaders and institutions.
• Sample: Transparency International CPI — countries with selective enforcement score worse on corruption and public trust.

What could disprove it

Show that societies thrive more when elites routinely exempt themselves from the rules they impose on others.

View belief and submit a challenge · 2 resources →

I believe that moral claims should be tested by their real-world consequences. A belief that sounds noble but reliably produces harm should be revised.

Confidence

High

Current support

• Good intentions are not sufficient when outcomes repeatedly harm the vulnerable.
• Evidence over time reveals whether a moral rule actually serves human flourishing.
• Sample: Bastiat's broken-window fallacy (1850) — visible 'benefits' of destruction hide unseen losses, a template for testing moral policies by outcomes.

What could disprove it

Show that moral systems which ignore observed outcomes produce more benevolent societies than those that learn from results.

View belief and submit a challenge · 3 resources →