Categorical imperative: act so that you treat humanity always as an end, never merely as a means.
Founder — edit Persons are not means to ends
Edit this beliefUnchanged
I believe that no person should be treated as a means to another's end. Benevolence requires seeing each person as an end in themselves.
- Confidence
- High
- What could disprove it
- Show that routinely instrumentalizing people for collective goals produces better moral outcomes than respecting individual ends.
- Current support
Using people as tools dehumanizes both victim and user.
Kant's categorical imperative remains a practical guardrail against political cruelty.
Sample: Kant's Formula of Humanity (1785) remains a standard reference in medical ethics and human-subjects research rules.
- Supporting resources
- Studies, data, books, and references that help express and test this belief.
Overview of duty-based ethics that forbid using persons as tools for others' goals.
Version history
No prior versions recorded yet. Edits and rulings will appear here.
Share this belief
Social channel preview — invite others to read the full record and submit evidence.
Submitted challenges
No challenges yet. Be the first to test this belief against reality.