Challenge My Beliefs
← Community

Working group

Science & Evidence

Members interested in Science & Evidence gather evidence and challenges around these 4 public beliefs.

Strong contributions here should become structured challenges on the matching belief pages. The founder records rulings on the website — the community does not vote beliefs up or down.

Belief Card

Test claims against evidence

Science & Evidence
Unchanged

I believe that claims about reality should be tested against observable evidence. Benevolence without truth becomes well-intentioned harm.

Confidence
High
Current support
  • Reality does not bend to wishful thinking; policies must answer to results.
  • Observable outcomes are the final court for factual claims.
  • Sample: NIH reports over 300,000 registered clinical trials — modern medicine built on observable, replicable evidence standards.
What could disprove it
Show a class of important beliefs where objective evidence and observed outcomes should not carry decisive weight.

View belief and submit a challenge · 3 resources

Belief Card

Expertise is not infallible

Science & Evidence
Unchanged

I believe that expertise is valuable, but expertise is not infallible authority. Science serves society best when it can be questioned openly.

Confidence
High
Current support
  • Expert consensus has been wrong before and will be again.
  • Progress requires challenge, replication, and revision.
  • Sample: Ioannidis (2005) estimated most published medical research findings may be false positives given bias and sample sizes.
What could disprove it
Show that treating expert authority as beyond question produces better long-term outcomes than open scrutiny.

View belief and submit a challenge · 2 resources

Belief Card

Education teaches how to think

Science & Evidence
Unchanged

I believe that education should teach people how to think, not only what to think. A unified benevolent society needs citizens who can reason, not just obey narratives.

Confidence
High
Current support
  • Indoctrination produces conformity, not wisdom.
  • Critical thinking is essential for evaluating leaders, media, and policy.
  • Sample: SHEG Stanford studies found most students could not distinguish ads from news online without explicit critical-thinking training.
What could disprove it
Show that education focused on rote acceptance of approved views produces more benevolent citizens than education focused on reasoning.

View belief and submit a challenge · 2 resources

Belief Card

History studied honestly

Science & Evidence
Unchanged

I believe that history should be studied honestly, including our own failures. Societies that mythologize themselves repeat their worst mistakes.

Confidence
High
Current support
  • Sanitized history prevents learning from past atrocities and errors.
  • Honest memory is a safeguard against repeating cruelty in new forms.
  • Sample: Post-war Germany's honest confrontation with Nazism contrasts with societies that suppressed history — different trust and stability trajectories.
What could disprove it
Show that nations which suppress uncomfortable history become more just and unified than those that confront it.

View belief and submit a challenge · 2 resources

Join the community

Early members help shape working groups and moderation norms. Tell us who you are and what you want to contribute.

View Science & Evidence on the public site